Continue reading the main story
An Interactive Guide to
Capital Markets
There are many kinds of financial markets, addressing many kinds of needs. Roll over to explore parts of the U.S. debt and equity markets.
Source: SIFMA 2012 Data
CLICK TO EXPLORE MORE >>
A dangerous new form of a powerful stimulant is hitting markets nationwide, for sale by the vial, the gallon and even the barrel.
The drug is nicotine, in its potent, liquid form — extracted from tobacco and tinctured with a cocktail of flavorings, colorings and assorted chemicals to feed the fast-growing electronic cigarette industry.
These “e-liquids,” the key ingredients in e-cigarettes, are powerful neurotoxins. Tiny amounts, whether ingested or absorbed through the skin, can cause vomiting and seizures and even be lethal. A teaspoon of even highly diluted e-liquid can kill a small child.
But, like e-cigarettes, e-liquids are not regulated by federal authorities. They are mixed on factory floors and in the back rooms of shops, and sold legally in stores and online in small bottles that are kept casually around the house for regular refilling of e-cigarettes.
Evidence of the potential dangers is already emerging. Toxicologists warn that e-liquids pose a significant risk to public health, particularly to children, who may be drawn to their bright colors and fragrant flavorings like cherry, chocolate and bubble gum.
“It’s not a matter of if a child will be seriously poisoned or killed,” said Lee Cantrell, director of the San Diego division of the California Poison Control System and a professor of pharmacy at the University of California, San Francisco. “It’s a matter of when.”
Reports of accidental poisonings, notably among children, are soaring. Since 2011, there appears to have been one death in the United States, a suicide by an adult who injected nicotine. But less serious cases have led to a surge in calls to poison control centers. Nationwide, the number of cases linked to e-liquids jumped to 1,351 in 2013, a 300 percent increase from 2012, and the number is on pace to double this year, according to information from the National Poison Data System. Of the cases in 2013, 365 were referred to hospitals, triple the previous year’s number.
Examples come from across the country. Last month, a 2-year-old girl in Oklahoma City drank a small bottle of a parent’s nicotine liquid, started vomiting and was rushed to an emergency room.
That case and age group is considered typical. Of the 74 e-cigarette and nicotine poisoning cases called into Minnesota poison control in 2013, 29 involved children age 2 and under. In Oklahoma, all but two of the 25 cases in the first two months of this year involved children age 4 and under.
In terms of the immediate poison risk, e-liquids are far more dangerous than tobacco, because the liquid is absorbed more quickly, even in diluted concentrations.
“This is one of the most potent naturally occurring toxins we have,” Mr. Cantrell said of nicotine. But e-liquids are now available almost everywhere. “It is sold all over the place. It is ubiquitous in society.”
The surge in poisonings reflects not only the growth of e-cigarettes but also a shift in technology. Initially, many e-cigarettes were disposable devices that looked like conventional cigarettes. Increasingly, however, they are larger, reusable gadgets that can be refilled with liquid, generally a combination of nicotine, flavorings and solvents. In Kentucky, where about 40 percent of cases involved adults, one woman was admitted to the hospital with cardiac problems after her e-cigarette broke in her bed, spilling the e-liquid, which was then absorbed through her skin.
Continue reading the main story
Advertisement
The problems with adults, like those with children, owe to carelessness and lack of understanding of the risks. In the cases of exposure in children, “a lot of parents didn’t realize it was toxic until the kid started vomiting,” said Ashley Webb, director of the Kentucky Regional Poison Control Center at Kosair Children’s Hospital.
The increased use of liquid nicotine has, in effect, created a new kind of recreational drug category, and a controversial one. For advocates of e-cigarettes, liquid nicotine represents the fuel of a technology that might prompt people to quit smoking, and there is anecdotal evidence that is happening. But there are no long-term studies about whether e-cigarettes will be better than nicotine gum or patches at helping people quit. Nor are there studies about the long-term effects of inhaling vaporized nicotine.
Unlike nicotine gums and patches, e-cigarettes and their ingredients are not regulated. The Food and Drug Administration has said it plans to regulate e-cigarettes but has not disclosed how it will approach the issue. Many e-cigarette companies hope there will be limited regulation.
“It’s the wild, wild west right now,” said Chip Paul, chief executive officer of Palm Beach Vapors, a company based in Tulsa, Okla., that operates 13 e-cigarette franchises nationwide and plans to open 50 more this year. “Everybody fears F.D.A. regulation, but honestly, we kind of welcome some kind of rules and regulations around this liquid.”
Mr. Paul estimated that this year in the United States there will be sales of one million to two million liters of liquid used to refill e-cigarettes, and it is widely available on the Internet. Liquid Nicotine Wholesalers, based in Peoria, Ariz., charges $110 for a liter with 10 percent nicotine concentration. The company says on its website that it also offers a 55 gallon size. Vaporworld.biz sells a gallon at 10 percent concentrations for $195.
Mr. Paul said he was worried that some manufacturers outside the United States — China is a major center of e-cigarette production — were not always delivering the concentrations and purity of nicotine they promise. Some retailers, Mr. Paul said, “are selling liquid and they don’t have a clue what is in it.”
Cynthia Cabrera, executive director of Smoke Free Alternatives Trade Association, said she would also favor regulations, including those that would include childproof bottles and warning labels, and also manufacturing standards. But she said many companies already were doing that voluntarily, and that parents also needed to take some responsibility.
“You wouldn’t leave a bottle of Ajax out,” she said. Advocates of e-cigarettes sometimes draw comparisons between nicotine and caffeine, characterizing both as recreational stimulants that carry few risks. But that argument is not established by science, and many health advocates take issue with the comparison.
“There’s no risk to a barista no matter how much caffeine they spill on themselves,” said Dr. Neal L. Benowitz, a professor at the University of California, San Francisco, who specializes in nicotine research. “Nicotine is different.”
Without proper precautions, like wearing gloves while mixing e-liquids, these products “represents a serious workplace hazard,” he said.
The nicotine levels in e-liquids varies. Most range between 1.8 percent and 2.4 percent, concentrations that can cause sickness, but rarely death, in children. But higher concentrations, like 10 percent or even 7.2 percent, are widely available on the Internet. A lethal dose at such levels would take “less than a tablespoon,” according to Dr. Cantrell, from the poison control system in California. “Not just a kid. One tablespoon could kill an adult,” he said.
294 Comments
Llyn
Wisconsin 4 hours agoSally
Ontario 4 hours agoLast time I checked they are causing some real damage, and e-cigarettes are helping a lot of people to get off those tar-filled cancer sticks.
And why the sudden fury over nicotine, which has been a quit-smoking aid for decades? Because e-cigs actually work to quit smoking, and Big Tobacco is very, very scared.
Alamac
Beaumont, Texas 3 hours agoOkay, warnings good. Labels good. Even restricting the sale of the stuff to adults--good. But don't even think about criminalizing yet another substance; the last thing we need is another excuse for the military/prison industrial complex to be putting millions more people behind bars.
Ronald Watso
Madrid, Spain 1 hour agoCertainly there are huge oversights in the article. For instance, deaths related to e-cigarettes are from their liquid misuse, which could apply to the misuse of almost anything including wine or water. The article also fails to mention that in court the FDA failed to prove that e-cigarettes contained any harmful substances, even after spending millions in research. Actually, the FDA lost the case and is still licking its wounds. By the way, nicotine can not be absorbed in the lungs (such is impossible) nor has its harmful effects been proven scientifically. Also, left-out is the millions of people saved by using e-cigarettes instead of normal cigarettes: two million Brits a year, for instrance. Of course, if you inject water into a vein, you will die. Once again, the author cites two political doctors: Benowitz and Cantrell, whose interests are money and fame.
s. berger
new york 1 hour agoJean
Tucson, AZ 1 hour agoSarah Flowers
Kitty Hawk, NC 1 hour agoThen I shouldn't have to pay taxes that cover the tax loopholes those particular "many...companies" take, not when they are unwilling to have my full oversight vis-a-vis the FDA.
yipyap
jardine1678 1 hour agoSteve
Westchester 1 hour agoBleach usually smells terrible and few people keep it sitting around on a table or let their kids see them putting it into a device that they then insert into their mouth. Also, chemicals like bleach are generally in large bottles and are clearly marked.
Easy access, delicious smells, and trusted adults who clearly enjoy ingesting liquid nicotine will lead to children's deaths. Do we really need to wait for catastrophe before fixing this?
Reader
Canada 1 hour agoI didn't know it was a neurotoxin! I didn't know a teaspoon could kill. I didn't know it could cause serious damage if the amount in an e-cigarette seeped into bedding and then came in contact with skin. I didn't know it came in scents and flavours that attract little kids. I didn't know lots of it is manufactured (...) in Chinese factories.
This is EXACTLY the kind of health information a newspaper should be providing.
294 Comments